DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2012-05537
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he did not sell 57.5 days of leave in conjunction with his 6 July 2010 enlistment extension.
Members of the Board considered this application on 14 January 2014.
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Ltr, AFPC/DPSOA, dtd 6 March 2013
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2012-05537
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show that he did not sell 57.5 days of leave in conjunction with his 6 July 2010 enlistment extension.
Executive Director
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible to sell 30 days of leave. As of this date, this office has not received a response (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04532
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence the applicant requested or wanted to sell back leave at the time he extended for retraining. Because this was his first extension, he was authorized to sell back a maximum...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03543
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03543 INDEX CODE: 121.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for 12.0 days of accrued leave that he earned while performing 135 consecutive days of active duty. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). The...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02132 INDEX CODE 112.07 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: No XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given a constructive reenlistment to permit retirement the first day of the month following High Year of Tenure (HYT) and he be able to sell excessive leave in conjunction with that reenlistment. Exhibit D....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03925
This extension was completed, signed, and approved in Mar 2009; however, the local personnel office said they could not update the system until 1 Dec 2009, which was the first day of her extension. In this regard, we note that DPSIM initially recommended disapproval of the applicants request; however, after reviewing the extension paperwork, DPSIM now recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to her leave account and we agree. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03511
We also note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating the applicant signed up to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents by going to the DVA website and also extended to obtain the necessary retainability but never received the official Statement of Understanding (SOU) from the Total Force Service Center. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05736
Members of the Board considered this application on 10 October 2013. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIM, dtd 2 March 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05736 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03476
Since the applicant sold the maximum 60 days of leave previously, he is ineligible to sell his 42 days of lost leave in conjunction with his 1 Dec 2012 retirement. Although he was paid for 60 days of accrued leave in conjunction with his 1 Jul 1995 retirement, the evidence reflects that he was recalled to active duty in Jul 2009 under the Rated Officer Recall Program and retired again on 1 Dec 2012. Therefore, in the interest of justice we recommend the applicants Extended Active Duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02745
He was credited with an additional 2 non-paid inactive duty training points, for Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02745 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. lieutenant colonel by the Calendar Year 2011 Line and...